This isn’t what’s being sold. The OP is also saying things like, “frontier AI models demonstrate intelligence at human levels or above.” If this is true, a use

This isn’t what’s being sold. The OP is also saying things like, “frontier AI models demonstrate intelligence at human levels or above.” If this is true, a user shouldn’t need to curate their words to maintain the illusion of intelligence from the system. If LLMs are just a tool, with limits, just like every tool, then what you say is easy to accept, learn, and adapt to. For the last several years we’ve been told to bring natural language to it, the tools adapts to the user, and many have called it intelligent. People are accepting the first answers from an LLM as established truth, regardless of how the question was framed. I’m using it how the people selling it are saying to use it. And when I do that, it’s not very good. If they want to adjust their messaging and scale back the hyperbolic claims, then I can adjust how I use it, my expectations for it, and maybe have a more positive view. Until that happens, I’ll judge it based on the high bar they’ve set for themselves, where it routinely falls short.