2 ms·
If anything, I think the terms for this are almost too good. You never end up paying more than the cost of purchasing the device outright if you decide to keep
by nsagent 2mo ago
If anything, I think the terms for this are almost too good. You never end up paying more than the cost of purchasing the device outright if you decide to keep the device. And considering it can have a term of up to 30 months (24 month lease, with 6 months more before you're charged the remaining cost of the device), you've just gotten a zero percent interest loan for 30 months. That's actually cheaper than buying it outright at the start of the term due to inflation. I seriously cannot see a downside to this program on the consumer's end if they end up keeping the device.
If the customer is the sort of person that upgrades yearly then it reduces hassle: no extra effort for valuing a trade-in or selling to a third party. It affects these customers the most because they might be able to recoup more in a third party sale in exchange for effort on their part.
- quietsegfault 2mo agoWith the previous iPhone upgrade plan, I upgraded yearly and it was seamless. When I did have an issue where Apple did not register my return of the device, Apple executive customer support was all over things and got me fixed quickly. I doubt “klarna” will have even 1% of the customer service that Apple provided.
- bigmadshoe 2mo agoThe downside is that it causes people to buy phones they can’t afford because it seems cheaper. People don’t reason about $50 per month the same way they do about $1200. The mistake in your comparison is assuming the target customers were going to buy the phone anyway, when they weren’t.
- nsagent 2mo agoWhat a paternalistic response. Apple provides a better deal than the typical telecom — not gouging the user on a lease-to-own program, and your response is the sheep are too dumb, best to take the option away for everyone? If you want to fight that battle, then educate consumers. I'm all for education. Taking away reasonable options because some people aren't capable of making decisions in their own interest is the worst kind of nanny state behavior.
- bigmadshoe 2mo agoI think that’s a fair point, and my response wasn’t to suggest that financing is inherently a bad thing. I was replying to the question “doesn’t everyone win from this?”, and I believe the realistic answer is that no, Apple wins and financially uneducated people lose.