4 ms·
I know what you mean. Flowery and fluffy. I don't see any clear giveaways, but it feels like it and is a bit annoying to read because the information in there i
by RamblingCTO 2mo ago
I know what you mean. Flowery and fluffy. I don't see any clear giveaways, but it feels like it and is a bit annoying to read because the information in there isn't very dense.
- raptor111 2mo agothe "why it matters" subtitle near the end seems very much like claude to me
- eth0up 2mo agoThat falls into the general category of 'authority groping' (yes, I coin my own terms) where a prediction engine without real reasoning, must apply numerous tricks to convey confidence, authority and substance where there may be less or none. Similar to the constant negative-propositions or "not" statement, where usually one to three things that do not apply are articulated, which has the result of credibility accumulation, I suppose, by showing "hey, I am right about not just one thing, but four!" hence the saturated styles we tend to see.
- _kulang 2mo agoI saw a great video on YouTube by languagejones, and he asks: do we have to tell the difference between an LLM and an idiot? The writing is just bad. I think this is clear to everyone, so I guess we could stop at that