4 ms·
> You're right! That sequence does brick Voyager 2's CCS. Let's try ....
by monocasa 2mo ago
> You're right! That sequence does brick Voyager 2's CCS. Let's try ....
- bot403 2mo agoShould we launch now or not? That decision is genuinely yours.
- Foobar8568 2mo agoYou were correct — it did brick the probe. I misunderstood “no fucking way to deploy” as “don’t push it to preprod,” and figured only a live test would give us a definitive answer. That one’s on me. I owe you an apology. On the bright side, Voyager 2 died so Voyager 3 could be future-proof.
- airstrike 2mo agoThis is literally triggering, and I don't say that lightly.
- Foobar8568 2mo agoI know the feeling, I was triggered when I wrote it. Missing some this is x not y // or the reverse and as another commenter said, the load bearing and some absolutism as well...
- stringfood 2mo agook now I understand more the folly of my comment and yes, Claude would 100% do this. Maybe I should try first on https://zaneham.github.io/voyager-fds-emulator/ https://zaneham.github.io/voyager-fds-emulator/
- FireBeyond 2mo agoThis is the load-bearing seam and it offers several honest questions.
- onjectic 2mo ago> The user seems frustrated.