4 ms·
I agree with the concept but the name is terrible. "Core team" gives one the impression that this is the most important team to the project. It's not! It could
by xyzzy_plugh 2mo ago
I agree with the concept but the name is terrible. "Core team" gives one the impression that this is the most important team to the project. It's not! It could be called the "governance facilitator" team or admins or something.
Please name the next iteration something less spicy.
- jonringer117 2mo agoThere was an architecture team which existed, I would assume the usage of "core" was to disambiguate. https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture https://github.com/nixpkgs-architecture
- nextaccountic 2mo agoexactly what rust devs realized. they went from "core team" to "leadership council" in the next iteratiion