4 ms·

Does anyone have the original source of this information? This article seems to be AI generated: https://www.pangram.com/history/fdf6dfd6-1a9c-4267-a90c-a3cf271

• john_strinlai 2mo ago
  while looking at the wiki (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movile_Cave https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movile_Cave), this popped up from 2015 from bbc earth: https://web.archive.org/web/20210531110415/https://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150904-the-bizarre-beasts-living-in-romanias-poison-cave https://web.archive.org/web/20210531110415/https://www.bbc.c...
• croes 2mo ago
  Pangram isn’t a reliable detector
  • BlackRabbit1 2mo ago
    Still the linked article reads like slop
    • croes 2mo ago
      Doesn’t mean it is. I bet you can find pre-AI articles that sound like slop too.
      • lelanthran 2mo ago
        I keep requesting this here, but so far I haven't been given any links. There's probably a good reason for that.
• phyzome 2mo ago
  Pangram isn't useful for single documents. Too many false positives. It only gives something approaching actionable results if you use it on an entire corpus.
• vixen99 2mo ago
  An updated Turing Test is overdue or has someone suggested one?