2 ms·
But then you're lying. Why not add the comment "no tarot function" without reference to whether it existed in the past? A bit confusing because it's a trivial a
by midtake 3mo ago
But then you're lying. Why not add the comment "no tarot function" without reference to whether it existed in the past? A bit confusing because it's a trivial and seemingly unrelated statement but at least then you wouldn't be lying.
- modzu 3mo agobecause it would be rejected again
- ASalazarMX 3mo ago"Tarot function is not present in this version, and won't be present in any releases future ever".
- recursive 3mo agoThat makes it sound like they made a mistake.
- twostorytower 3mo agoThey did.
- recursive 3mo agoIrrelevant. They have all the leverage and the submitter has none.
- joshspankit 3mo agoIf being shown or admitting to their mistake was something they were cool with, this post wouldn’t exist
- recursive 3mo agoYou can just add one and then remove it. That way you're not lying. And also it doesn't sound like you're disagreeing with them so you sound like a problem.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- bladeacidic 3mo agoWhy not just lie? The white lie is the most expedient thing to get the results you want, which is getting the app into the app store. It's not a slippery slope into a total moral decay of you as a human being. If a friend is hiding from an abusive partner, and that partner asks where your friend is, telling the truth would put your friend in danger, so lying is an important skill to have. The lie in this case gets past a pointless requirement.
- NamlchakKhandro 3mo ago[flagged]
- paxcoder 3mo ago[dead]
- dingaling 3mo agoLying is a subversion of morality and strawmanning doesn't change that. If you can't state the truth, then don't answer.
- sph 3mo agoThank you Kant, but the world is never as black-and-white
- jodrellblank 3mo agoWhy not say “app now has no tarot function” which can be read as implying that it used to but doesn’t actually say that.
- baybal2 3mo ago[dead]
- knlam 3mo agoYou are dealing with unreasonable party here. Like the game theory, you have to think what is the next best move. I bet you have not deal with appstore review before, I remember last time even mention google or android in privacy policy will get your app rejected
- port11 3mo agoThe endgame is that all apps publish a list of the functions they don’t have, to appease a baroque and obtuse review system.