3 ms·
I don't think you need to be keeping abreast of them really, you just need to be using the best model you can get enough tokens from, which for many people is F
by petesergeant 2mo ago
I don't think you need to be keeping abreast of them really, you just need to be using the best model you can get enough tokens from, which for many people is Fable 5 @ $200ish, ideally fanning out implementation to cheaper models
- bronson 2mo ago> which for many people is Fable 5 Not for me, Fable refuses to debug Linux kernel bugs. Unless you say who you're speaking for, it sounds like you're just shilling for Anthropic.
- petesergeant 2mo agoI would love to be shilling for Anthropic, but I am not. I am part of a group of about 30 developers, and 80% of them are using Fable 5 and very sold on it, with the remainder being committed to Sol. Both are competent, but among our set (who will try anything), Fable 5 is definitely winning. The fucking refusals for security work are insane though, and I hate them. I use Sol and Grok 4.5 as my inline debuggers/reviewers, and both do well, and are decent at token save. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 found some interesting bugs when I tried it a few days ago, and I'm curious to see if that also joins the code-review line up