3 ms·

These posts have to be Chinese bots, these models are all trash. Used it via OpenCode for an hour, cost me one hour of my life. It is for anything complete tras

• greenavocado 2mo ago
  (1) you used opencode (2) what provider did you use. openrouter is trash because they shit up the model serving. no max effort and horrific cache utilization, on the order of 50-75%, absolutely garbage. beware
  • alex0015 2mo ago
    What should we be running deepseek on besides opencode? I chose it because I heard good things. Also provider is directly through deepseek credits.
    • greenavocado 2mo ago
      oh you used opencode go? harness: omp.sh
    • stavros 2mo ago
      I use the Deepseek API and pay peanuts. Very satisfied.
• dan_q 2mo ago
  [flagged]
  • EchoVoicy 2mo ago
    Point 1 finger out, and you point 4 back.
    • ricketycricket 2mo ago
      Said the man with 6 fingers.
• apitman 2mo ago
  I've found it to be pretty good so far.
• r14c 2mo ago
  I've gotten a lot of good work done with deepseek models. Like with any generic harness there's some tuning that has to happen. I used open code for a while, but I've landed on pi.dev as my go to since its easier to tune and has better deepseek integration. iirc open code is quite bad at utilizing cache and doesn't have a lot of ways to specifically tune the harness for a particular model.
• stiltzkin 2mo ago
  [dead]