3 ms·
im not sure why they would even bother with the cameras at that point.
by john_strinlai 2mo ago
im not sure why they would even bother with the cameras at that point.
- ranger_danger 2mo agoIt says why in the article... to make them look better by only releasing positive videos.
- john_strinlai 2mo agoright, i read the article, and i disagree that selectively releasing "positive" videos would make them look better.
- philipov 2mo agoThey don't care what you think. You're not their target audience.
- john_strinlai 2mo agoyes, i am aware, thanks. (that's why i wrote my opinion on a message board, instead of a letter addressed to the director of ice)
- philipov 2mo agoThey don't want to shake the support of moderates who are already part of their coalition and aren't paying that much attention. Those people won't notice the selectivity, even if they hear about it in passing, as long as they're not constantly confronted with it directly.
- fscknpublic 2mo ago[dead]
- cdrnsf 2mo agoAccompanied by childish memes, Bible quotes and the music of artists that loathe them.
- stevenwoo 2mo agoThis is no different than any other law enforcement agency in the USA historically - it’s a curated source of positive PR that they get taxpayers to fund - it’s never used willingly as a source of truth when law enforcement is in the wrong.
- disillusioned 2mo agoAccountability theatre, quite literally.
- georgemcbay 2mo ago> im not sure why they would even bother with the cameras at that point. Lots of data to feed into their Palantir systems to keep track of l̵a̵w̵f̵u̵l̵ ̵p̵r̵o̵t̵e̵s̵t̵o̵r̵s̵ terrorists.
- john_strinlai 2mo ago>Lots of data to feed into their Palatir systems i didnt think of that, actually, and facial recognition training and such actually sounds like a pretty plausible reason.