5 ms·
Next time start with this level of nuance. Flippantly arguing semantics about controversial issues is not the way.
by dec0dedab0de 2mo ago
Next time start with this level of nuance. Flippantly arguing semantics about controversial issues is not the way.
- manlymuppet 2mo agoIt really isn't semantics. How do you compare a criticism, with a policy? Trickle-down economics doesn't have any legislative appropriations. It's not taught in economics classes. Like saying "what's the difference between a boat and a car?" I can tell you that a boat is not a car, but I can't compare the wheels of a car with a boat, nor the keel of a boat with a car. They are different things is all I'm trying to say. Now as for why I didn't expand with nuance earlier, in my defense I was expanding, but elsewhere in the thread. I foolishly thought this was enough.