3 ms·
I just sent you a long article which you could not have read in the time it took you to reply. I would suggest you start there and read that article, which outl
by noah_buddy 2mo ago
I just sent you a long article which you could not have read in the time it took you to reply. I would suggest you start there and read that article, which outlines several cases where the author was able to create contrived false positives and negatives.
- no_multitudes 2mo agoI read this article about a week ago. Did you read my reply? I am interested in natural false positives (ones not written to fool the classifier.)
- Matticus_Rex 2mo agoContrived false positives and negatives could (and should!) always be possible. That doesn't tell us anything about the natural false positive and negative rates, and a lot of people who have actively tried to use voice instruction to get models to consistently fool the detector without iterating against it directly have failed.