4 ms·

Running Llama 3 between your ears? Don't you and all the people in this thread claiming AI slop know that AI was trained on human writing?

• no_multitudes 2mo ago
  >Don't you and all the people in this thread claiming AI slop know that AI was trained on human writing? Do you think this implies that it is impossible to distinguish LLM-generated text from human text? I don't think that follows at all. >Running Llama 3 between your ears? I'm always happy for a chance to improve my classifier! Can you provide some long-form writing from before 2024 that uses this style?
  • runtime_terror 2mo ago
    No, I dont think there is any reliable data to be able reliably classify AI text. So far what I've seen is humans actually fail this task reliably
    • no_multitudes 2mo ago
      Interesting hypothesis! I find that my internal sense of whether the article is AI almost always agrees with Pangram when I check it, and almost never triggers on pre-2024 text, even if I didn't know beforehand when it was written. I think this cuts against your hypothesis -- if I was just recognizing a generic style of writing, I would expect it to fire on pre-2024 text, and if I was just recognizing text written in 2026, I would expect it to fire much more often when reading blog posts of already-established writers who I trust.