3 ms·
Here we go again. AGPL is untested in courts. There is no definitive definition of what could be considered within the blast radius such that it would require
by xyzzy_plugh 2mo ago
Here we go again.
AGPL is untested in courts. There is no definitive definition of what could be considered within the blast radius such that it would require AGPL licensing.
There's a reason AGPL is banned at Google and most sane companies. It's simply too dangerous.
You can't simply say "clients aren't bound" because it depends.
I'd rather see the BSL used here to be perfectly honest. At least it's simple.
- jnwatson 2mo agoWhile the AGPL is untested, what a derived work is is less so. It is entirely outside the bounds of the intentions of the authors of the AGPL for clients to be infected.