3 ms·
You're probably right, and it will be an incredibly sad day when we have completed replaced the human part of creation in our culture with AI creation Might ju
by bluefirebrand 3mo ago
You're probably right, and it will be an incredibly sad day when we have completed replaced the human part of creation in our culture with AI creation
Might just be final nail in the coffin for our cultural stagnation
- scotty79 3mo agoHuman literature won't be completely replaced, same way photography and print didn't replace painting. They just outgrew it billion times (in volmue at least) and the humanity is richer for it.
- latexr 3mo agoHumanity is richer because photography outgrew painting? How do you figure? I’m not judging or disagreeing, I’m just interested in the argument. On a utilitarian sense, no doubt a photography is more useful than a painting. But in the artistic/creative sense (what the conversation is about), I’m not sure the case is that clear-cut, hence the question.
- scotty79 3mo ago> But in the artistic/creative sense (what the conversation is about), I’m not sure the case is that clear-cut, hence the question. Art for me is joy (or in wider definition emotion) of the beholders (and the creators). The sum of joy (and other emotions) that people derive from making, sharing and viewing photos manyfold exceeds sum of emotional value that paintings deliver.