> Here's a question I have for all the predictable "I don't need a union" SWEs out there: if unions were so bad, why do companies literally spend millions and b

> Here's a question I have for all the predictable "I don't need a union" SWEs out there: if unions were so bad, why do companies literally spend millions and break the law to make sure they don't happen? The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. It's possible to unions to make everyone worse off, not just the employer. I'm not saying that's always the case, but this is not a good argument.