I think you fail to understand what it means to evolve a language specification rather than breaking one. I think given your obvious bias in both method and ap

I think you fail to understand what it means to evolve a language specification rather than breaking one. I think given your obvious bias in both method and approach you should probably just plan on learning a new language every 2-3 years or so when what your ideas of the "best" way to do things changes and languges supporting the latest fad are developed. Probably, just avoid commenting on C++ altogether as it is a waste of your energy because it will quite frankly never do what you want given the aims and goals of the steering committee.