4 ms·
Right. The original commenter already seemed to understand that. It's a new issue because the reference count needs locking, whereas previously it didn't becau
by quietbritishjim 2mo ago
Right. The original commenter already seemed to understand that.
It's a new issue because the reference count needs locking, whereas previously it didn't because it was implicitly synchronised due to the GIL being locked.
But the original commenter asked: hang on, I thought the GIL wasn't locked for numpy?
Now you have reached the start of the conversation.