4 ms·
>It’s pretty typical stuff that you might expect an experienced engineer to do if they effectively use such tools daily. It's also the kind of stuff that someb
by Muromec 2mo ago
>It’s pretty typical stuff that you might expect an experienced engineer to do if they effectively use such tools daily.
It's also the kind of stuff that somebody can learn in a week, so not hiring the right person who just didn't spend this week of time yet for whatever reason is a loss.
- pmg101 2mo agoYeah it tells you nothing of value. It's the Recency Bias taken to its ultimate conclusion isn't it. Anything I learned about AI I learned in the last few months but somehow that's as important as all the experience of my decades long software career? Come on.
- Muromec 2mo agoIt signals you don't have enough time or will to chase the latest stuff, otherwise you would have learned it with other cool kids half a year earlier. It carries some signal, but I would not choose based on this alone. I would even consider selecting against this to a certain point, but I also work in a place that COBOL on a mainframe. YMMV.
- dan_q 2mo ago> I would even consider selecting against this to a certain point I agree. A technology professional who views themselves as "one of the cool kids" (read: easily manipulated by social media) is a legitimate security threat, as are many of the popularly promoted approaches to "LLM-assisted software developement".
- Muromec 2mo agoI haven't considered looking at it from the security thread angle. Can you expand on this?
- vanuatu 2mo agoI used to think this was true until my company adopted a similar process, and the amount of very senior candidates who used it very ineffectively was highly surprising (eg staff candidate only using the default Google search AI), whereas the more junior candidates figured out you could one shot the problem but were unable to explain their code