3 ms·
My points of disagreement are - At least to me, AI writing (especially from Claude) is actively painful to read. It's worse than the average person who has fla
by drngdds 2mo ago
My points of disagreement are
- At least to me, AI writing (especially from Claude) is actively painful to read. It's worse than the average person who has flawed English (or just sucks at writing) because of how verbose and stylistically repetitive it is.
- AI writing is a strong probabilistic signal that what I'm reading is going to be crap in terms of the actual ideas and content too, even if it isn't the case 100% of the time. I just don't want to waste my time on that kind of thing.
- base698 2mo agoWhen I use it for writing I usually have an idea or thesis to explore already. I typically write it out stream of consciousness. The core idea is mine. I'm not using LLMs to think for me, instead just edit the writing so it has proper grammar and the run ons are reduced. Even better for something that has data. You can pull PDFs with encoded tables and extract the data into consistent units to compare. You can have it write code to do it and cross check the outputs. You can do that in a minute. Would take hours without an LLM.