4 ms·
> Parent your kids. Ok... > There are countless services to block content you don't want. How easily will a motivated 10 year old work around them? > There
by oblio 2mo ago
> Parent your kids.
Ok...
> There are countless services to block content you don't want.
How easily will a motivated 10 year old work around them?
> There are dedicated ISPs and cell phone providers that block content you don't want.
Fairly sure there aren't any of these where I live. People cannot and will not move for a different ISP (WTF :-) ).
> Removing internet anonymity as a rule will do far more harm than good.
Most likely, and the true legal solution is to turn social media into actual media. It's killed newspapers, so it should replace them. Social media should be legally liable for everything ANY user posts unless they can prove they have active protection measures. I don't care how they do it, but they should do it. Yes, this will probably kill all social media. Burn it all down and let's build something better.
- dizlexic 2mo ago> How easily will a motivated 10 year old work around them? Not very easily if they're implemented across their networks and devices. > Fairly sure there aren't any of these where I live. People cannot and will not move for a different ISP (WTF :-) ). For ISP you can use your own firewall, install the millions of filters etc. > It's killed newspapers, so it should replace them. Social media should be legally liable for everything ANY user posts You're absolutely of base, every media source I'm aware of leverages social media to continue driving traffic to their own sites. Do you have any idea how insane this is when you're dealing with a world of jurisdictions and different definitions of "truth"? You'd rather regulate the platform then the people who abuse it because... i'm assuming you just hate the platform is successful and doesn't behave how you think they should. Is your argument the entire world should make your parenting easier or they should be punished?