3 ms·

Its a cool demo, but its gpt-3.5 level stupid, or worse. edit: Ok, I will self-apologize. Its apparently a 3B model. Mighty impressive for what it does.

by aenis 2mo ago

selcuka 2mo ago
It's a quantised 8B model (Llama 3.1 8B to be exact). [1] https://taalas.com/the-path-to-ubiquitous-ai/ https://taalas.com/the-path-to-ubiquitous-ai/
teiferer 2mo ago
How time flies. Just 3.5 years ago, gpt-3.5 was touted as almost AGI, we're all going to be replaced by machines and worst case they will kill us all. And here we are, not much later, and it serves as the benchmark for "stupid"..
- aenis 2mo ago
  Yup. Where I work we invited a bunch of people circa May 2023: a few top tier academics, a few government and NGO officials in charge of our industry, and a few startup founders. We are a big company, so people were kind enough to come and give speeches - and discuss. This was a roundtable on what's going to happen. You could play some of the speeches verbatim today and they would not feel out of place. And that is telling. We had a Stanford professor saying that gpt-3.5 can do everything he can - just better, and he feels his profession is on borrowed time. We had a government guy saying that entire swaths of jobs will be displaced before the year ends. And so on. The interesting thing is, a lot of people believed it then - and a lot of people believe it now. I wonder if we will have the same deja vu in, say, 2029. No, for sure not. It's going to be done and dusted for human thinking by end of this calendar year.
- mdp2021 2mo ago
  > gpt-3.5 was touted as almost AGI If you have the names, so we can record them in the History of Laughing Stocks... Also remember maybe all those who shouted "that is really, precisely unintelligent". Incidentally: also Sam Altman, in an interview with Lex Fridman, said "that is not proper intelligence but currently we do not know how to get there" - if very Altman refused to call it AGI...

Its a cool demo, but its gpt-3.5 level stupid, or worse. edit: Ok, I will self-apologize. Its apparently a 3B model. Mighty impressive for what it does.

by aenis 2mo ago

Its a cool demo, but its gpt-3.5 level stupid, or worse. edit: Ok, I will self-apologize. Its apparently a 3B model. Mighty impressive for what it does.

selcuka 2mo ago

It's a quantised 8B model (Llama 3.1 8B to be exact). [1] https://taalas.com/the-path-to-ubiquitous-ai/ https://taalas.com/the-path-to-ubiquitous-ai/

teiferer 2mo ago

How time flies. Just 3.5 years ago, gpt-3.5 was touted as almost AGI, we're all going to be replaced by machines and worst case they will kill us all. And here we are, not much later, and it serves as the benchmark for "stupid"..

aenis 2mo ago
Yup. Where I work we invited a bunch of people circa May 2023: a few top tier academics, a few government and NGO officials in charge of our industry, and a few startup founders. We are a big company, so people were kind enough to come and give speeches - and discuss. This was a roundtable on what's going to happen. You could play some of the speeches verbatim today and they would not feel out of place. And that is telling. We had a Stanford professor saying that gpt-3.5 can do everything he can - just better, and he feels his profession is on borrowed time. We had a government guy saying that entire swaths of jobs will be displaced before the year ends. And so on. The interesting thing is, a lot of people believed it then - and a lot of people believe it now. I wonder if we will have the same deja vu in, say, 2029. No, for sure not. It's going to be done and dusted for human thinking by end of this calendar year.
mdp2021 2mo ago
> gpt-3.5 was touted as almost AGI If you have the names, so we can record them in the History of Laughing Stocks... Also remember maybe all those who shouted "that is really, precisely unintelligent". Incidentally: also Sam Altman, in an interview with Lex Fridman, said "that is not proper intelligence but currently we do not know how to get there" - if very Altman refused to call it AGI...