3 ms·
Excellent. Yes, please give free users more access and leave paying codex users in the dust. Wise plan, Sam.
by johnnyApplePRNG 2mo ago
Excellent.
Yes, please give free users more access and leave paying codex users in the dust.
Wise plan, Sam.
- cbg0 2mo agoHow are they leaving paying users in the dust? This is their cheapest model which you can already use full-blast even on a $20 plan.
- beering 2mo agoIt’s interesting how people will interpret news in ways that seem bizarre, but they were looking for something to be angry about.
- ssl-3 2mo agoEh? I've paid for ChatGPT (and in the recent ~year, codex) for about as long as it was available to pay for. I'm not upset by the offer of giving luna to the masses for free -- not at all. Should I be upset that people can cut-and-paste to the lessest of the new model variations for free? If so, then why? Nothing was taken from me here. I'm still going to keep doing whatever it is that I do with the tools that I've been using. I'm not in competition with anyone, and even if I were then it wouldn't be with those who are using ChatGPT for free on the web.
- rrvsh 2mo agoWhat do you mean? Codex paid plan treats me quite well. I'm not going to complain that free users get more shit, especially when it doesn't affect me in any way.
- dannyw 2mo agoDid you not get all the Codex resets (including banked resets), the removal of the 5hr limit, or even the fact that you can use your Codex sub for API purposes and it's allowed under their terms? I dunno, I've honestly never been happier as a Codex customer. Sure, there's been less bonus usage resets recently, but the amount of productivity and value I've gotten out of my $20/month personal subscription is bonkers. If you're price insensitive, Fable 5 is definitely still the best, but a lot of people aren't.
- nickthegreek 2mo agoThe literally lowered Luna costs for codex users (and lowered the amount of quota it uses for sub users) earlier this week. This change came for Codex users first.