3 ms·
The update itself has strong AI tells: > I do write like this sometimes. The short sentences, the reversals, the one-word lines—all of it. It’s just the way it
by ricardobeat 3mo ago
The update itself has strong AI tells:
> I do write like this sometimes. The short sentences, the reversals, the one-word lines—all of it. It’s just the way it is.
> That says something about my writing. It says nothing about who wrote it.
> So let me be plain about it: Claude was not here. No LLM wrote this—not a sentence of it, nor was it outlined, drafted, reviewed, checked, etc. by one
Either the author is doing this on purpose, or this is some kind of art project. I don’t buy the “just a coincidence” story at all.
- ryeights 3mo agoRight, I feel like I'm taking crazy pills reading all the comments taking this article seriously. I think AI has broken HN. The readership is so head-in-the-sand about AI that they wouldn't recognize 2000 words of Claudeslop if it genuinely slapped them in the face
- raincole 3mo agoMost commenters only read the title. That's it. The alternative explanation (the top commenters actually read it and somehow didn't recognize it's obviously written with AI) is just too bleak and I choose to not believe that.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- yulker 3mo agoThe whole post has that immediate LLM "mouthfeel"
- movpasd 3mo agoIt's LLM-like in the details, but there are certain patterns of repetition and idiosyncrasies, also certain analogies I don't think an LLM would make (like the aliens thing), that make me believe that it's written by a human.