3 ms·
That is a significant leap in logic. A vibecoding tool is not a McDouble. Nor is Chris Kempczinski the same person as Dario Amodei. The biggest difference is t
by NathanKP 2mo ago
That is a significant leap in logic. A vibecoding tool is not a McDouble. Nor is Chris Kempczinski the same person as Dario Amodei.
The biggest difference is that there are only so many ways to eat a McDouble, but you can actually wield a vibe coding tool with skill. There's nothing stopping you from looking at the code and asking for structural reworks or refactors that please your code taste. In fact one of the best use cases for AI coding tools is vibe refactoring old apps where the code is straight up horrible.
- hellojomp 2mo agoA significant leap in logic is my middle name :) (I am not an AI)
- bijowo1676 2mo agohow about tools like Lovable ? is Lovable used internally to create and improve Lovable product itself ?
- drowntoge 2mo ago> but you can actually wield a vibe coding tool with skill. There's nothing stopping you from looking at the code It’s hard to give something like “vibe coding” a rigid definition, but I think we can all agree that it’s inversely correlated with "looking at the code". The more I examine the code while building, the less the activity is about vibes. So, used this way, it's true that it's not a McDouble anymore, but it's also not so much of a vibecoding tool anymore either.
- lodovic 2mo agoI think babysitting the AI would be a better term than vibe coding. At work they call it "AI assisted engineering" and "synthetic coworkers"