4 ms·

I'm more curious which Web 3.0 startup's success is going to end the Web 2.0 era. Unfortunately, Web 3.0 might involve semaphore and smoke signals.

• numair 18y ago
  I don't get why this guy was voted down. The truth of the matter is, the old guard always remains, they just become irrelevant. Facebook won't die, but it also won't be cool and consume your life -- the same way AIM isn't dead, but it's not like you sit around and think "they're reading everything I'm writing! It's only a matter of time before they make billions off of this!" In fact, to this point -- I remember that, when Friendster first started, the founder's goal was to sell the company to AOL for something like $100M. This was why he turned down the Google stock.
  • jjames 18y ago
    I assume he was down voted for painting Web 2.0 as an aesthetic-driven convenience based entirely on an over-indulged consumer nirvana where we can waste 10 hours rounding our corners while the foundation of our entire civilization might cease to be. In the same vein, verything we currently rely on could equally be called out. This could be the end of Automobile 10.0, Computer 4.0, Internet 3.0, Electricity 18.0 and Civilized Culture 1.0 (I kid..). Design has a high purpose for some and the study of usability, ergonomics and tools to automate your way to market are nothing even remotely new. Web X.0 will work because it serves people better in whatever paradigm they may live, be it civilized or relatively barbaric. Obviously, limited by the eradication of the internet entirely. Humane interfaces on a non-existent platform will never get any eyeballs :)