4 ms·
In case you are serious, there is no mention of how this calculation was empirically made. It seems much more likely that this is fortuitous teleological transl
by carbocation 14y ago
In case you are serious, there is no mention of how this calculation was empirically made. It seems much more likely that this is fortuitous teleological translation rather than an actual discovery of the speed of light cryptically hidden away in the Vedas.
- pitchups 14y agoThe original article referenced by the link above has more information on why the calculation may be authentic and can be found at http://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/t_es/t_es_kak-s_light_frameset.htm http://www.infinityfoundation.com/mandala/t_es/t_es_kak-s_li...
- carbocation 14y agoNo, those add no empirical support. They mention no derivation of the numbers, no explanation for how they were measured. They don't clarify, beyond the blog post, whether this should be accepted as a discovery or treated as coincidence. They just restate the same coincidence.