2 ms·
Yeah, shutting down to that specific browser fingerprint would be the better way. Sometimes, being able to recognize a user has it's benefits for good /s
by dylan604 2mo ago
Yeah, shutting down to that specific browser fingerprint would be the better way. Sometimes, being able to recognize a user has it's benefits for good /s
- lesostep 2mo agoOr just drop websocket connection to them. Refreshing pages to establish connection again is semi easy for someone who made a honest mistake (and Could make them more cautious), but if someone wants to trigger web-socket disconnect all the time, it would become cumbersome. Add something like fail2ban, and you're set enough against passing trollers, but not interesting enough to draw attention from people that like the challenge.
- Retr0id 2mo agoBut don't let them know they've been shut down, use a shadowban.
- effseven 2mo ago[dead]
- nickthegreek 2mo agoAgreed. I'd just have 2 chat pools, once you break rules, you get moved to the rule breaker pool with the other like minded individuals. Well behaved individuals wouldn't even know or care about the separation.