4 ms·
This is one of those headlines where I simultaneously think "cool" and now have a new source of low-grade background anxiety about. It can have a seat next to
by empath75 2mo ago
This is one of those headlines where I simultaneously think "cool" and now have a new source of low-grade background anxiety about. It can have a seat next to false vacuum collapse.
- trollbridge 2mo agoThe good news about black holes is that even if one transited the solar system, it would be extremely unlikely to come anywhere near earth.
- ben_w 2mo agoThe bad news is that if a black hole is not primordial, the minimum mass is high enough (2-4 M_sol) that it doesn't so much "pass through our system" as "we pass through its". I'm not 100% confident, but rough approximation suggests that a close approach of even 5 AU even at typical interstellar velocities might have an unplesant climate impact by increasing the eccentricity of our orbit.
- mynegation 2mo agoDid you mean 5 AU or 5 ly? 5 AU at 2-4 M sol intuitively seems like a complete and utter havoc.
- ben_w 2mo agoWe know what something with about 2 solar masses looks like at about 5 light years, because there is such a thing a bit closer: the Alpha Centauri system. So (and again, this is very rough approximation) I mean AU: consider the high speed of interstellar encounters so it won't be there for long, and that it takes the full pull of Sol 6 months to turn us around 180°. Also, yes, in general this would cause a lot of the Oort cloud to destabilise and a long period of bombardment of all the planets.
- kbelder 2mo agoAt 5 AU, gravitational force would be 1/25 or 4% the strength of the sun at 1 AU. If the black hole was four solar masses, it would exert a pull about 16% as strong as the sun. Probably not enough to rip us out of orbit, but enough to seriously perturb it. I think it's at least an end-of-civilization event. 5 AU is the perfect distance to really wreck Jupiter, though.
- bell-cot 2mo agoNot an astrophysicist, but I'm thinking 5 AU could quickly fry the Earth - because it takes very little in the way of solar comets, asteroids, and dust to build a temporary accretion disk around such a black hole. That disk might have a temperature of >1M degrees. Plus the dynamo effects of the disk's interactions with the solar magnetic field? Yeah. 5 ly sounds much safer.
- ben_w 2mo ago> Yeah. 5 ly sounds much safer. Well yeah. I clearly could've phrased this better though: I was aiming for "here is an example distance which *is* bad", not as it appears to have been understood "here is the distance where it is *not* bad".
- kbelder 2mo agoYeah, I'm sure you're right. I was looking purely at orbital mechanics and gravity, but I think a four-stellar-mass black hole would certainly have other harmful environmental effects that would be felt at that range.
- trollbridge 2mo agoDéstabilise orbits - definitely, but the same would be true of a star or other celestial body. But our risk of getting sucked into a black hole is really tiny. (Although personally if I had a chance to enter a black hope, I would. I’m just naturally curious.)
- 14u2c 2mo ago5AU seems incredibly close. That's inside the orbit of jupiter. How would it not destabilize the entire system?
- 98codes 2mo ago> extremely unlikely But never zero.
- Zigurd 2mo agoTake comfort in the fact that compared to the size of the universe, the speed of light is like molasses in January. Cosmological eschatology is a very slow game, and the odds of you being alive and in the right place to be a spectator are literally astronomically small.
- OneDeuxTriSeiGo 2mo agoIn that case you may enjoy “The Blue Afternoon that Lasted Forever” by Daniel Wilson. https://web.archive.org/web/20260310115201/https://www.williamflew.com/blue.html https://web.archive.org/web/20260310115201/https://www.willi...
- alansaber 2mo agoConcern for celestial events is a bit like one of your gut bacterium being concerned with your work schedule
- vkazanov 2mo agoThese little guys often do get a hammering on fridays...