> The point I'm making isn't (in life or in this blog post) that LLMs do a better job than humans. Your literal headline claim is that LLMs are better than hum

> The point I'm making isn't (in life or in this blog post) that LLMs do a better job than humans. Your literal headline claim is that LLMs are better than humans. With a caveat attached, sure, but you're immediately setting the tone with that. > It is unfortunately a fact that one can be both things: a startup and a language learning app You know what you do in that case? Teach the languages you know! It's arrogant and greedy beyond belief to think you have any ability or right to "teach" people 58 languages. If you were genuinely interested in helping people learn and not making a quick AI startup cash grab, you'd start with the language pair you're most fluent in, then if that has any success, slowly expand your offerings once your concept is proven, hiring more people as you can. Of course, such a rational business as that probably doesn't sound as juicy as "we used AI to SOLVE TRANSLATION" to the investors you're hoping to attract...