> we should find it unsurprising that LLMs tend to perform better at code, than at human language tasks or reasoning Math is pure reasoning and stock LLM is al

> we should find it unsurprising that LLMs tend to perform better at code, than at human language tasks or reasoning Math is pure reasoning and stock LLM is already better at it than 99.9% of humans. And as for human language, agentic LLM can produce a perfectly human text. The fact that AI texts have tells is just because default settings are the same for millions of people using given LLM and almost everybody just pretty much on-shots the text instead of doing it agentically with anti-slop detection and rephrasing in the loop.