4 ms·
Is Gemini really that bad? I mean, I would always prefer anthropic for agentic coding, and apparently openai has the math thing cornered, but if I'm using ai li
by galangalalgol 2mo ago
Is Gemini really that bad? I mean, I would always prefer anthropic for agentic coding, and apparently openai has the math thing cornered, but if I'm using ai like a search engine gemini does that just fine. That may be all they were actually aiming for whatever else they say.
- trollbridge 2mo agoIt’s not bad. It’s just not better than other models. It’s very much in the same class as Grok, Cursor Grok Build, etc.
- WarmWash 2mo agoIt's vision capabilities are still top notch, and it seems pretty natural that most everyday human users are going to want strong vision over strong language/coding.
- wongarsu 2mo agoIf you need a less censored model that's still pretty smart and capable of some lateral thinking, it's great Same niche as Grok, which is also great at search and less censored. Gemini is maybe a bit smarter and better on long contexts
- scottyah 2mo agoGemini works amazingly well, and is better suited for most use cases. When most people speak of it negatively (especially here), it's just with the task of coding, which is a small subset of what google should be training its AI for.
- lII1lIlI11ll 2mo ago> Is Gemini really that bad? It still produce full-blown hallucinations for me sometimes, even in 2026. The kinds ChatGPT stopped generating by 2025. It is cheap and fast though.