3 ms·
> The majority of federal government spending is a wealth transfer to old and poor people Sorry, but that's a ridiculous take. Thats just like saying that pub
by myrmidon 2mo ago
> The majority of federal government spending is a wealth transfer to old and poor people
Sorry, but that's a ridiculous take.
Thats just like saying that public schools are a wealth transfer from the working class to students, or that health insurance is a wealth transfer to old and sick people.
It's neither useful nor precise. Things are never an actual "wealth transfer" when both sides consider it worthwhile-- that's just an ordinary trade.
- lotsofpulp 2mo ago>Thats just like saying that public schools are a wealth transfer from the working class to students >or that health insurance is a wealth transfer to old and sick people Both of these are also true statements. >Things are never an actual "wealth transfer" when both sides consider it worthwhile-- that's just an ordinary trade. It's not an ordinary trade, it's a forced payment via the government's monopoly on violence, which is why it falls into a wealth transfer. I would consider it (mostly) worthwhile when it's students because they turn into future workers. However, I would prefer to opt out of social security and old age healthcare tax (Medicare) because I will be getting less into the system than I pay into the system. That is an inevitable future due to demographics. Note that I am not saying wealth transfers are categorically bad, just wanted to point out the hilarity of a country that can spend $1T+ per year on wealth transfers and still be afraid of "socialism". And it's far more than $1T, because the health insurance mandate to not price health insurance based on health risks is another massive wealth transfer probably worth at least another trillion.