4 ms·
Great, what are you going to train it on?
by psd1 2mo ago
Great, what are you going to train it on?
- munksbeer 2mo agoI am trying to not sound offensive here, but given the question you're asking, I don't think we're going to join up here. I think one of us is missing something fairly fundamental, and my hunch is it is you. The agent will already have seen enough super optimised code and read enough material about it. It will read the entire repo you're in, and understand how the code should be structured and written to work efficiently. And anything it doesn't get at first, you write about in the AGENTS.md file and tell it. Then it works. If you can teach a human to write specialised 3d rendering code, you can distill the same teachings to an agent in text form, and it'll work. I am supremely confident of this, and I bet that neither you nor the author of the article has bothered to try properly.
- psd1 2mo agoI'm not offended - great diplomatic putdown, well played
- inigyou 2mo agoI suppose you wouldn't train it using a traditional LLM type of training and you might not have an LLM type of model either. American Fuzzy Lop usually manages to generate valid files of any format you want, using a genetic algorithm that the author didn't even call ML. AlphaGo trained against itself. Such things aren't impossible when you can automate the reward function, though you might have to come up with novel techniques.