5 ms·
How does money change that trust? They certainly have breached their word on this in the past (for non-paying users of Facebook).
by teiferer 2mo ago
How does money change that trust? They certainly have breached their word on this in the past (for non-paying users of Facebook).
- simonw 2mo agoBecause they didn't have a financially backed contract with those non-paying users.
- ignoramous 2mo agoThis is what the Muse Code launch blog post says: We're also beginning to accept requests for zero data retention. Contact Meta sales to request this. https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-muse-code/ https://developer.meta.com/ai/resources/blog/build-with-muse...
- simonw 2mo agoZero data retention and "we don't train models on your input" are different things. Retaining data is common for investigating abuse.
- customguy 2mo agodoes the contract enable the customer to monitor/search Meta to ensure they are honoring the contract? if there is no mechanism for that it means very little. Though I bet/hope some will feed them "watermarked"/unique but worthless things and watch for traces of that to pop up in models or something like that, but that's hatdly enough to just take their word for it.
- simonw 2mo agoThat tends to be what discovery in lawsuits is for.
- customguy 2mo agoThat's circular reasoning, how would there be a lawsuit if customer have no way of knowing?
- simonw 2mo agoSensible companies don't take that risk.
- lunar_mycroft 2mo agoSensible companies don't do a lot of stuff Meta has already been caught doing - sometimes with real consequences (but never enough to actually deter them, of course) - in the pursuit of more data.
- teiferer 2mo agoSensible companies also don't gamble $80B on something obviously stupid like the Metaverse.
- customguy 2mo agoAnd intellectually honest people don't engage in circular reasoning and then rather than acknowledging it just repeat it, yet here we are.
- simonw 2mo agoAre you calling me intellectually dishonest? Please justify that.