4 ms·
> that would still make them a unicorn in the dating market nowadays. Are you having trouble in the dating market? Perhaps you're frustrated by frequently meet
by hackyhacky 2mo ago
> that would still make them a unicorn in the dating market nowadays.
Are you having trouble in the dating market? Perhaps you're frustrated by frequently meeting women who are experienced enough to recognize your inadequacy.
The solution is to improve yourself, not to shame women.
- codedokode 2mo agoBut aren't you also "count-shaming" parent comment for preferring women with specific number of previous partners? Maybe they are not the only one frustrated. Also, in Muslim countries and regions it is typically expected for a woman to have zero previous partners to get married, or at least having relationship only within a marriage.
- hackyhacky 2mo ago> But aren't you also "count-shaming" parent comment I prefer the term "misogyny-shaming." > Also, in Muslim countries Really, Muslim countries? Muslim countries that are world-famous for denying women even basic legal rights? Muslim countries that treat women strictly as men's property? You're telling me that those same countries have strong cultural norms about controlling women's sexuality? I am truly shocked.
- rhrhfjfjjr44 2mo ago[flagged]
- hackyhacky 2mo ago> There's no shortage of promiscuous young women, but there are so few wives nowadays that it all feels rather pointless. Do you know the definition of "wife"? It's a married woman. There are plenty of women who are willing to be married, but one of two things is preventing that: (a) you are disqualifying them for silly and capricious reasons, or (b) they are disqualifying you because you're a misogynist who thinks you're entitled to dictate what women do with their bodies before they've even met you. > Yes, everyone is. Plainly false. > I've had my fair share of women in the sack. The more I listen to you, the more clear it is to me why you can't find a partner.