> This argument applies equally well to most things. Well you uncoverd the reason to why I belive, what I belive. > Evolution doesn't need biologists, but peo

> This argument applies equally well to most things. Well you uncoverd the reason to why I belive, what I belive. > Evolution doesn't need biologists, but people who need to make decisions dealing with the consequences of evolution on epidemiology sure do! I agree but the question is not if we plan and make dicisions, the question is who makes the plan and dicisions for who. > Defending a country is a hugely complicated mess, and moving battleships over here is going to have ramifications over there. Policing society is difficult and complicated - we try to cut down on crime by targeting something over here, and it causes problems over there. > Clearly, we should call the whole thing off, and allow international affairs and society take care of themselves - all the way through invasions and murder? Well I actually agree that we should let society take care of that (Not trolling I actually agree). The most broken down version of such a, for a advanced economy would be this (20 min video): How to provide law and police without state: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o And a more practical discussion about order without goverment you can get here (lecture): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pNrtgioFs0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pNrtgioFs0 Stats of Anarchy (or self goverments) or something close to it is one of the hot subjects in development economics. About half of the world stats are failed or almost failed states, these are states that do not have the power to efficently do what a policy and law system would do in a first world country. So there most be something else going on, why do the work as well as they do and people are not killing each other all the time. This paper was quite influential: "Assume Anarchy? Why an Orthodox Economic Model May Not Be the Best Guide for Policy." Raghuram Rajan (Director of the IMF’s Research Department) Im not saying that I can prove that the institutonal structure discribed in the videos above (and the reaseach of all the people) would work they way I would want it to but I do think it has potential to improve on democracy.