To test a candidate, I want to see: 1. How well can they write a requirements spec for an AI? How well can they eliminate and disambiguate points of confusion?

To test a candidate, I want to see: 1. How well can they write a requirements spec for an AI? How well can they eliminate and disambiguate points of confusion? How well can they iterate upon the requirements by considering the AI's plan? 2. How well can they review the AI's output against the requirements? Can they identify and communicate what was missed, and translate it into updates to the requirements, fix the code via continued chat, otherwise by hand? 3. Can they avoid under-engineering, over-engineering, and unnecessary bloat? The point is that if an interview is not assessing these things, it likely is wasting everyone's time.