> The quotation is your speech, but the literal words were not ... I’m actually fine with the idea that people are quoting LLMs yeah this I agree with and am f

> The quotation is your speech, but the literal words were not ... I’m actually fine with the idea that people are quoting LLMs yeah this I agree with and am familiar with, and I guess I'm guilty of just assuming that this is what people are talking about when they say that LLM-generated stuff is their own speech - because, > people where they treat the LLMs output as their own literal thoughts just seems like a different issue altogether. lying about the provenance of something isn't a matter of speech, it's a matter of - I don't know, deception / dishonesty. It's like a separate issue. very interesting that we both sort of saw it different ways though.