4 ms·
the amount of content posted per second to facebook is unfathomable. a quick google (just for a rough order of magnitude) says ~65,000 posts per second. add in
by john_strinlai 3mo ago
the amount of content posted per second to facebook is unfathomable. a quick google (just for a rough order of magnitude) says ~65,000 posts per second. add in instagram (which is worse for CSAM) and its gotta be at least double that.
it would require millions on millions of employees, spread across ~every country. between the payroll, buildings and property, equipment, etc. i just dont think its possible at that scale.
(again, emphasizing that im not saying this as an excuse for facebook, but that i dont really think facebook/instagram should exist at all)
- gambiting 3mo agoRight, but the article isn't about posts, but about a paid ad campaign - surely those are started in numbers that could be moderated?
- john_strinlai 3mo ago>Right, but the article isn't about posts, but about a paid ad campaign the comment that started this thread says: "these technologies have proven ineffective to moderate content. User posted and otherwise" which is what i (and i assumed the parent to my comment) was replying to. i agree that paid ad campaigns alone is more tractable.
- wmf 3mo agoNo, because most ads are created by automated systems (many of which are scam/spam ads) and Meta doesn't want to lose revenue by slowing the system down to human speed.
- deleted 3mo ago[deleted]
- lokar 3mo agoI would think that they can classify most posts as safe with very high accuracy. Certainly it’s not unreasonable to have them disprove that And the scope could be further reduced by looking at posts with more then a few views.