4 ms·
> Hassabis seems to have been pushed aside. Yeah he seemed too reasonable to me, relative to the fervor. Whoever ends up in charge needs to do a lot of frothin
by taurath 2mo ago
> Hassabis seems to have been pushed aside.
Yeah he seemed too reasonable to me, relative to the fervor. Whoever ends up in charge needs to do a lot of frothing to catch up to the ferver that would justify their valuations and investments
- HarHarVeryFunny 2mo agoProbably not going to happen, but I'd love to see Isomorphic Labs separate from Alphabet with Hassabis still as CEO. He's too pure minded to be at company like Google.
- IncreasePosts 2mo agoHe won a nobel prize for his work on protein folding while at Google...it seems like they give him a lot of room to explore problems that aren't directly related to serving ads
- antupis 2mo agoBut it was Google fault that they really cannot productize all that innovation that happened DeepMind. Google probably now fumbled with world models and this exodus will create next giant in that space.
- nolist_policy 2mo ago> Google probably now fumbled with world models [...]. Can you explain this more precisely?
- ackbar03 2mo agoI have a feeling this might negatively impact Isomorphic as well since they also fall under Alphabet
- HarHarVeryFunny 2mo agoHopefully not - Isomorphic also have external investors (maybe 10-20% ownership?), who may be willing to buy it outright from Google if they lose interest, and Hassabis is now said to be "leaning into" the role of Isomorphic CEO, which is at least pursuing his goal for scientific advance via AI, if only in one specific (important) direction. https://endpoints.news/demis-hassabis-leaning-into-isomorphic-ceo-role-amid-alphabets-ai-shake-up/ https://endpoints.news/demis-hassabis-leaning-into-isomorphi...
- kridsdale1 2mo agoSame thing happened to Yan LeCun. Real scientists are skeptical. Wall St and the people who serve it don’t like that.
- WarmWash 2mo agoGoogle's capex is to capture the compute purchases from the other labs. The amount they are spending on Gemini is probably shockingly low...and hence researchers leaving for better watered pastures.
- dnnehgf 2mo agothis is roughly how i've been reading their approach, but i wonder when/if this changes. what actually makes them start caring about having the most capable model? maybe nothing. i suppose they could be happy in a world where they (a) are still the agents' preferred search index and (b) own or produce a good percentage of the hardware that anthropic and openai run on.
- weatherlite 2mo ago> i suppose they could be happy in a world where they (a) are still the agents' preferred search index and (b) own or produce a good percentage of the hardware that anthropic and openai run on. If the goal is to maximize share price (which it is) this is probably the safest approach. Why do they have to keep chasing developing the best model when they can a) charge everyone for the cloud infra b) have a "good enough" experience for normal consumers Their current setup will be worth trillions. Already is. Let anthropic get paid for the most expensive queries while they get a bill from Google for their cloud/TPU use. GCP grew 82% YOY with 24B revenue and improving margins. So GCP became a 100B business. Anyone doubts it's gonna double in less than 5 years? Gemini just needs to be good enough for normal folks who want personal agents for everyday use. I don't think Google has to compete with Anthropic on making the best agentic programming model.
- mikert89 2mo agoI’ve heard the pay at deep mind is low and people are complaining about it
- bmitc 2mo agoHow low are we talking?
- HarHarVeryFunny 2mo ago> Whoever ends up in charge needs to do a lot of frothing I don't get the impression from interviews that Kavukcuoglu is that guy - he seems like a safe pair of hands, but not someone that is on a mission. OTOH I don't even think this is the right race to be in.