3 ms·
I didn't mention peer review. The bare minimum for scientific analysis is conclusion drawn from observations based on data points. This article is more like a r
by hackyhacky 2mo ago
I didn't mention peer review. The bare minimum for scientific analysis is conclusion drawn from observations based on data points. This article is more like a rant occasionally augmented by pictures of anime boobs. There is no attempt at scientific rigor. A serious presentation could have maintained the rigor even outside the peer-review process (which, despite your assertion, would likely have no objection to the subject matter).
- vovavili 2mo agoI think what you're trying to say is that this article isn't at the highest level of epistemic certainty. That's not surprising for a given subject matter. The author explicitly acknowledges that -https://www.jsanilac.com/dispelling-beauty-lies/#:~:text=Don%27t%20Trust%20Me%0A%0ASome%20claim%20the%20author%20is%20a%20tasteless%20scoundrel%20who%20can%27t%20be%20trusted.%20As%20it%20happens%2C%20the%20author%20doesn%27t%20want%20to%20be%20trusted.%20Instead%2C%20examine%20the%20evidence%20and%20reasoning.%20Don%27t%20take%20anything%20you%20read%20on%20faith. https://www.jsanilac.com/dispelling-beauty-lies/#:~:text=Don...