3 ms·
> but there are many things which they are not good at which it is not cost effective or meaningful to improve Can you name a few such things so I can keep an
by naasking 2mo ago
> but there are many things which they are not good at which it is not cost effective or meaningful to improve
Can you name a few such things so I can keep an eye on them in the coming years?
- DiscourseFan 2mo agoNot explicitly, no, but its pretty obvious if you work in the industry and aren't blinded by AGI hype
- naasking 2mo agoThat's just vibes then. How is that supposed to be convincing?
- DiscourseFan 2mo agoUnless you are working for a competing firm or have a specific clause in your contract, you can literally just sign up for AI projects as a contractor and start contributing. You will see and understand everything after a few months. Nobody is hiding this knowledge really.
- naasking 2mo agoI use LLMs regularly for real work. I understand the current limitations, but you're talking about existing limitations that will never be overcome, because they cannot be overcome. I'm just asking for a couple of specific examples, and your evasions are increasingly suspicious.
- DiscourseFan 2mo agoIf you are using them and you are aware of their limitations it’s very different from specifically testing them for training purposes. You’ll get a much clearer picture that way.
- naasking 2mo agoThe continued vagueness suggests this isn't going anywhere, so I'll just conclude by saying that you've given nobody any real reason to believe this.