Then we agree right? >Make a law that someone is responsible for a bot's actions Original comment suggests creating a law such that a person is responsible fo

Then we agree right? >Make a law that someone is responsible for a bot's actions Original comment suggests creating a law such that a person is responsible for a bot's actions. I mention that no law is needed since people are already responsible for bot's actions. You mention that courts consider human/companies are responsible for their agents. And that defenses about agents acting autonomously are not successful in courts. Therefore a law that makes people responsible for bot actions is not needed, as that's the way it already is.