4 ms·
Circling back to where this began... > The claim above is that neither side has experience that's all that relevant to the type of conflict we'd expect in a Ch
by ericmay 2mo ago
Circling back to where this began...
> The claim above is that neither side has experience that's all that relevant to the type of conflict we'd expect in a China/US conflict.
This is a factually incorrect statement. I'm not sure why you're confused about what you are agreeing or disagreeing with at this point.
- estearum 2mo agoClearly that tickled a nerve for some reason. Here's a question: When someone says that you have no experience being a professional baseball player, do you say "errrhhmm ackshually, I brush my teeth every morning just like an MLB player does. I put on my pants every morning. I have even held a baseball bat!" Obviously a phrase like of "limited relevant experience" is constrained to a semantically meaningful set of things
- ericmay 2mo ago> When someone says that you have no experience being a professional baseball player, do you say "errrhhmm ackshually, I brush my teeth every morning just like an MLB player does. I put on my pants every morning. I have even held a baseball bat!" This doesn't make any sense. I've already explained to you the value of combined arms operations and combat experience. Here's a link for you to read through to help improve your understanding: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49174680 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49174680