2 ms·
I’m not surprised, that’s exactly the kind of person who would want this kind of technology. Remember, society as a whole will decide what's acceptable, there
by nkrisc 2mo ago
I’m not surprised, that’s exactly the kind of person who would want this kind of technology.
Remember, society as a whole will decide what's acceptable, there are no objective, natural laws that decide that. My gut feeling is that this is starting to cut close to what most people will find objectionable.
- frozenseven 2mo ago>the kind of person Yes, I'm interested in this. Yes, I think that comments like "dehumanizing and revolting" are a signal. I'm not going to feel bad about exploring this tech. So, yes, I am that person and will continue to be that person. >society as a whole will decide what's acceptable So, how would you describe the past few months? Years? You keep saying that we need to reject AI, yet adoption and the gamut of use cases keep ever expanding.
- nkrisc 2mo agoI think there are good use cases for AI, I never said otherwise. Creating simulacra of real people is not one of them, I believe. > yet adoption and the gamut of use cases keep ever expanding. I don't see how that's evidence in favor of AI, as many harmful technologies and products became very popular. In fact, that's exactly why I think a slower, more measured approach is necessary. Otherwise once the harms become apparent everyone wants to shrug their shoulders and say, "well it's too late now, everyone's using it."