3 ms·
I am glad that you do.
by elendilm 2mo ago
I am glad that you do.
- firesteelrain 2mo agoThen explain what you think it means, because your examples are about missile attacks on fixed bases, not control of the air.
- elendilm 2mo agoBro, logistics and refueling are important to maintain air superiority. If there are no bases, there is no air superiority. If you follow world news from non-western-propaganda-sources, you would know, the fighter jets shoot without entering Iranian airspace to stay clear of Iranian home made anti air defense and heat seeking tech along with potential russian and Chinese air defense. Entering Iranian airspace has been costly for US as witnessed by the famous shootdowns of multiple jets over the course of last several months.
- firesteelrain 2mo agoYou’re moving the goalposts. First it was missile attacks on bases, now it’s logistics and refueling. Those influence air operations, but they aren’t the definition of air superiority. Also, “multiple US jet shootdowns” is an extraordinary claim. What’s the evidence?
- elendilm 2mo agoI give up buddy. I thought you wanted explanation of how air superiority is acheived. Apparently you think it can be acheived without logistics and refueling. What is the need of evidence when you have magic by your side. So no - those fighter jets were not shot down. Magic saved them. You were right all along.
- firesteelrain 2mo ago[dead]