24 ms·
Yup. GNOME 2.0 was a little rough because they swung far enough the other way, but it was still a huge improvement to remove all the "unbreak me" obvious prefer
by JoshTriplett 2mo ago
Yup. GNOME 2.0 was a little rough because they swung far enough the other way, but it was still a huge improvement to remove all the "unbreak me" obvious preferences that only had one sensible answer. A few versions later, it was a delight to use.
- willtemperley 2mo agoGNOME 2 was lovely. Then GNOME 3 came and I switched to Mac.
- floriankarsten 2mo agoInteresting because i kept reading that people dislike GNOME 3 because it's like Mac.
- JoshTriplett 2mo agoMy experience with GNOME 3 was exactly the same as with GNOME 2: GNOME 3.0 was a little rough, but a couple of versions in, it felt great.