3 ms·
People don't car share in the US, and don't want to. Building arrangements that would rely on them are mostly illegal anyways. Allowing driverless cars to ser
by s1artibartfast 3mo ago
People don't car share in the US, and don't want to.
Building arrangements that would rely on them are mostly illegal anyways.
Allowing driverless cars to serve buildings without parking would be a huge step forward for those reasons alone.
For what it's worth, it's mostly illegal to build a housing that's the only served by buses too.
Last, the US has passed the point where it has the cheap labor and government competency for mass transit. Faster to do something now than wait for a new government or robotics that can replace all the construction workers and designers
- rangestransform 3mo agoThe unions will always get in the way of cheap transit construction, see the second ave subway in NYC
- bluGill 3mo agoUnions are part of the problem, but there are lots of other parts that all work together.