4 ms·
But running out of missiles—which is the accusation being made above—would be a tactical and logistics failure, not a strategic one.
by rayiner 3mo ago
But running out of missiles—which is the accusation being made above—would be a tactical and logistics failure, not a strategic one.
- Jtsummers 3mo ago> But running out of missiles—which is the accusation being made above—would be a tactical and logistics failure, not a strategic one. It's absolutely a strategic failure to enter into a war without sufficient munitions or logistical capability to sustain the war.
- Someone 3mo agoIs executing a strategy that you (should) know to be impossible to implement because of logistical limitations really a logistics failure? It’s not as if the US, a few years ago, said it needed way more long-range precision weapons in 2026, and didn’t get them, despite promises to the contrary.
- apawloski 3mo agoUnless the counts were unclear it would actually be all three!
- timacles 3mo agoYou have tactics and strategy mixed up. Killing Iran leadership was a tactical success. Continually shooting long range missiles into a giant country is a strategic failure.